Welp,
here we are. My 20th entry! This might not be the last one I post,
but I have officially filled the quota! Hooray, achievement!
So, I
guess documentaries have never been something I purposefully seek out for fun a
lot. I mean, I have, but I don’t all the time. But, that doesn’t mean I find
how they’re made any less entertaining. You have to give the filmmakers,
cameramen, and producers some credit. They’re filming around someone or
something’s life and story. They couldn’t have predicted everything like you
can when writing a film. It’s a real risk, documentaries. You can’t go in there
with a plan of exactly what you want to film.
So,
when I heard from Leeper that there are “rules” to filming documentaries, I
thought that was silly. You used to not be able to re-create a recount of a
story because it was “against the rules”. Who wrote these rules? Yes,
documentaries should absolutely be executed with finesse, but what’s with these
rules? Are the people who made up these rules the same people who say “get Morgan
Freeman to VO your documentary about sea slugs and BAM instant blockbuster”?
Now,
I understand that when dealing with real people you should be cautious to them
and their feelings and that you need SOME semblance of a plan when filming
documentaries. That’s not what I’m knocking here. I’m saying that if you come
into the documentary scene with a play-by-play outline of exactly what you want
to shoot and when to shoot it, you’re gonna have a bad time. And, with that in
mind, isn’t it a little silly to throw a set of rules into the mix?
From
what I’ve seen, the most iconic things in media are things that brought
something new to the table. If film as a visual medium is supposed to make us understand
something through seeing, why throw a wrench into the works? What if the most
effective way to do that involves a little rule breaking?
I had
never even heard of an animated documentary until Tuesday. At first, I thought
that was weird. But, when I understood the reason behind it, I can’t imagine
how it could have been executed better. Sometimes, to make your audience
understand your point, you have to jar them out of their comfort zone. I would rather
be jarred and uncomfortable than feel nothing at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment